In this post, I’ll give my view on some of the most popular optimized keyboard layouts.

Note: when I talk about the Carpalx, I am talking specifically about the QGMLWY layout, one of the fully optimized layouts.

Quick disclosure: I have experience with Dvorak and Carpalx, and none whatsoever with Colemak and Workman. I’ve included the two later ones because they are popular and I have read a lot about them.

Some of my runs on zty.pe. The first cluster is with Dvorak, and the second with Carpalx. 700 roughly corresponds to 50 wpm, and 1400 to 70 wpm. So I was "fluent" in Dvorak, and I'm getting close with Carpalx.



Let’s review:

Dvorak

(carpalx review)

Much better than AZERTY/QWERTY. With some downsides:

  • Some keys on the homerow have low frequency, such as the U on the left finger
  • I prefer having the vowels on the right, because then the better shortcuts with cmd, such as cmd-T (new tab) and cmd-W (kill-tab) will be more accessible on the left side (personal preference).
  • R and L placement is weird. Especially L.
  • ZXCV keys are changed, so you have to find a way to remap copy/paste (or look stupid anytime you copy/paste…)

Those are all acceptable downsides, you can fix or get used to them. The big issue with Dvorak is that you can do better. At the very least, Colemak does better.

And subjectively, I can testify that Carpalx-QGMLWY does feel better than Dvorak.

Colemak

Overall, Colemak is great. It is the popular alternative. It’s does well on both the performance side and the community side. It’s supported out of the box on many OSes.

Still, it does have some issues, and we can do slightly better (see QGMLWY VS COLEMAK).

Workman

Branded as “The Layout Designed with Hands in Mind”, it scores pretty well on the Carpalx benchmark, and the design has a lot of good assumptions (See section “Going Back to the Drawing Board” of the presentation page)

I cannot say more because I haven’t tried it.

Carpalx QGMLWY

The real deal. Feels great, super easy to learn (I’ve learned the mapping in two days). The key mapping is quite intuitive, because less frequently used keys are in less accessible spots, and all vowels are on the right side. And vowel-y consonants, such as H, are also on the left side.

If you think about it, H is found in “ch”, “ph”, “sh”, “th”, “wh”… So it acts as a vowel. Right hand. Done.

Some words are slightly weird to type, but they are not numerous (eg: “function” is weird). And I don’t like the placement of the P too much. The sequence “pa” and “py” is awkward.

And another downside is that it is used by virtually nobody. No community around it.

But I don’t give a damn about that and I love it.



Overall, for newcomers my recommendation would be split between Colemak, maybe Wokman. (And maybe Norman is worth a look).

Appendix: More keyboard layouts and comparison table.

Hororable mentions to some layouts not included in the review: Norman, Minimak, Qwpr, Asset

Table found here (see TABLE OF TYPING EFFORTS OF POPULAR ALTERNATIVES)